Pages

August 10, 2009

Army National Guard Recruiting FEMA Camp Or “Internment/Resettlement” Specialists


Canada Free Press
brings us this disturbing development...

The Army National Guard is now recruiting individuals to fill job positions described as an internment/resettlement specialist according to job postings on Monster.Com and other employment based Internet sites such as one listed here. In other words, they are recruiting individuals to man facilities that could be used to house political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals that the government doesn’t like. The term “resettlement” indicates that individuals holding this job position could also be responsible for moving people to other locations against their will. It is a documented fact that the U.S. government has numerous facilities at their disposal that could easily be used to house large numbers of people. Combine that, with this new job posting by the Army National Guard, and it seems as if the U.S. government is continuing to prepare for an eventual popular uprising.

Let’s look at some of the evidence we have of the U.S. government’s intentions to establish the infrastructure that could be used to house large numbers of political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals the U.S. government wants locked up.

HR 645 the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act is a proposed bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would authorize FEMA to build no less than six National Emergency Centers throughout the U.S. on closed or open military facilities. These facilities are to be designed to house large numbers of people. Why would emergency centers need to be built on closed or open military facilities unless there was a need to keep people from coming in and out of them?

30 comments:

  1. Yep...I do believe that's why I've put trip wires all around my property. That and the damned rabbits keep getting into my garden.

    ReplyDelete
  2. why do I keep hearing THEYRE COMING TO TAKE ME AWAY HA HA in my ear?..:)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Nick,

    A disturbing piece of legislation for sure, on a number of fronts. But ... we don't know the thinking behind the sponsors. Is this planning for the future of Gitmo? Pandemics?

    Don't get me wrong. I agree it's a bad idea, but ... let's not get too far ahead of ourselves. This angle is being promoted by the Canadians and Ron Paul. Paul is a guy with some good ideas but prone to kookiness. He's a libertarian after all ... pretty much a conservative on drugs.

    Ask the sponsors to explain themselves while telling Americans about the provisions of the bill.

    Just my two cents ...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don't get me wrong: I don't trust the gov't when we have so-called "conservatives" in charge. Even less so now. But this particular story doesn't spook me too much. The explanation I've heard is that the military hasn't had people specifically trained in internment/resettlement, so they've plugged ordinary soldiers and MPs into that role, with Abu Graib kind of silliness as a result. I can easily see BarryO being scared poopless that another Abu Graib kind of problem might happen on his watch. To me, loud music and panties on the head mean "PARTY!" but I guess mooselimbs are offended by that kind of thing. Barry doesn't want to offend the mooselimbs, so I'm confident this is all about Barry coverin' his azz and not much more.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We have no reason to fear our military at large. These are our sons and daughters. Will they obey orders to usher their own families away? Unlikely. "Oathkeepers"

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8/10/2009

    I do think the government needs to explain what is going on. It is scary when taken in conjunction with the step up in thug violence directed from the WHITE HOUSE at ordinary citizens who are exercising their first amendment right to free speech. I'm not going over the hill on this, nor am I turning away. I want an explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I used to doubt these things, but they are coming at us from such reliable sources that I want to know why the government ordered so many plastic coffins as well. I am not buying that number of veterans that are dying these days anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I first heard about this a few years ago. I found this one you tube...this isn't far from where I live.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-hvPJPTi4

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8/10/2009

    This is one of those conspiracy that I have not made up my mind about. Is it real, or not. Could it be real or not. Still on the fence on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8/10/2009

    A word on conspiracies ... If there are much more than a small number of participants, they don't work. Ask OPEC.

    Having several hundred U.S. congressmen as part of a conspiracy would require the suspension of logic and human nature. Some one would talk.

    The "mob" knows that every man has his price. Right, Nick?

    ReplyDelete
  11. We'll see. Obama (well, his puppet masters) wants a private Army.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Dave.. two words... rabbit stew

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Woman, eventually they're taking us all away, one way or another.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous8/10/2009

    DC, I agree. But can imagine a more poorly timed job announcement. At the time when conspiratorial fears are heightened, this bit of news gets picked up.

    At best, it is typical government ham-fisted operations. At worst, who knows? But this administration is pretty stupid (perhaps) leaving this big a vacuum to be filled.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Inno, you are right. But this is the kind of stuff that keeps emotions high during a time when the powers-that-be would like to calm fears all round. If this catches the imagination of even a small percentage of folks, feet will dig in even further.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous8/10/2009

    "These are our sons and daughters."

    I agree, Red. Our military is our greatest asset.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Opie,

    I can see the administration avoiding an explanation, because a denial, in some quarters, would give it all the more substance.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Bill... nowadays, a healthy dollop of suspicion is always called for.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Sue, what a timely link. Thank you so much.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Scalawag, we're all on the fence on so many things due to the lack of "transparency" in the administration. Who knows what to believe?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous8/10/2009

    DC, I have no price. I never wanna sport the mark of the squealer.

    ReplyDelete
  22. DC...that's why I think 9/11 conspiracy theorists are nuts; who could keep THAT a secret for long?

    But, having said that..I've heard about this for a long time and it's getting scarier and scarier...feels like the ground's more fertile for something like this now with a president who insults conservative pundits by name, mocks their TV outlets, has people in his party calling good Americans MOBS and McVeigh inspirers, etc.

    I keep thinking about why they want to take our guns away.....who wants to bet they'll arm the hideous OBAMA CIVILIAN CORPS he's got up his sleeve?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous8/10/2009

    Kid, perhaps his ecological & PC Green Corps. Non-recyclers will be detained along with climate change-scoffers and seat belt slackers.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous8/11/2009

    Army MP's denote this kind of work as "detention"...the internment part is new to me. I didn't know there was an MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) for internment.

    I'm with DC on the conspiracy angle. In the world of solid objects, there is nothing softer than the head of a political wirepuller.

    To think they would try this is strangely exciting. It would end a lot of uncertainty and clarify the battlefield.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous8/11/2009

    Exactly, Rhod ... Me? I think it's a little more complicated than maybe some of us conservatives would like it to be.

    I chalk a lot of this up to "hamhandedness", as Brother Nick says.

    Hey every one ... When the other side is imploding, let them.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No, our military would never enforce a law to take any American to an internment camp, just ask a Japanese-American from the 1940's.

    And I suppose you probably think they consider an anti-abortionist to be a "terrorist".

    Crazy conspiracy-theorists...

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous8/11/2009

    You're in the wrong place, Son, if you don't want some independent thinking and discussion.

    Who the hell mentioned abortion?

    Jeez.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous8/11/2009

    Rhod, every time the battlefield gets clarified, I realize that we're all standing uncomfortably close to it.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous8/11/2009

    "When the other side is imploding, let them."

    DC's right about that. And I'll bring the Cheetos.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous8/11/2009

    Son,

    I do suspect that the Obama Enemies List contains a who lotta folks who I respect, and there may be names there that'd shock us all.

    ReplyDelete

"We'll probably cringe at the stupidity of what you say, but we will defend to the death your right to babble" - Sig94