Pages

February 13, 2012

WHAT Was That?

We tuned into the Grammies last night for a bit, just in time for that sadistic, anti-Catholic horror show. So this is what passes for talent in the music industry.

'Nuff said. I'll know better next time to use the remote control wisely.

12 comments:

  1. If:
    A. Santorum wasn't surging in the polls and;
    B. Obama hadn't screwed the pooch with his hamfisted contraception/abortion cramdown on the Catholics

    then these stupid antics would have never been on TV. But now the libs feel an urgent need to delegitimize the Catholics and we'll be seeing more of this crap.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let them have their fun. It may well backfire on them!

    ReplyDelete
  3. innominatus - could be, but I bet that act was put together months ago. It is just part and parcel of the liberal insanity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gorges - I see very little press on this - of course. Can you imagine the flack that would have erupted if that was an imam instead of a priest?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Another reason to disconnect the damned set from the cable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Odie - I usually never watch any of those stupid award shows, but the wife....

    ReplyDelete
  7. Subvet - another reason to visit the library more often or buy one of those Nooks or whatever they call those electronic readers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Pop music? Sorry, the "freshest" tracks on my iPod are six years old. These no-talent hacks from the recent grammy's only serve to reinforce your humble Deacon's axiom: If it ain't Baroque, don't fix it!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would like to see Holder held.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Andy - baroque happens to be my fav also. Boccherini anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  11. WoFat - in irons? They do have a wonderful slimming effect on the buttocks.

    ReplyDelete

"We'll probably cringe at the stupidity of what you say, but we will defend to the death your right to babble" - Sig94