Pages

June 26, 2010

Spit and Polish, But Mostly Spit

I haven't paid much attention to the McChrystal-Obama affair. I read McChrystal's Wikipedia entry, and it's not notably different than the resume of Westley Clark , a vainglorious idiot of soaring bad character. Clark, like McChrystal was personally courageous from time to time, but so is an Atlanta cop, an EMT is Hartford's north end, or an agoraphobic crossing the street.

Both of them add up to fairly standard men of their kind. They seem to be brave. Without men like that you don't have a D-Day but you also don't have a Passchendaele - where probably a million men were wounded or killed in one 5-month operation in 1917.

The list of Passchendaeles, big and small, grew after 1939, up to and including the fracas I was drawn into. So I'm not the guy with automatic respect for an officer class plastered with service ribbons. I'd like to know, for instance, where McChrystal earned the CIB (Combat Infantryman's Badge) when his bio doesn't show any real, leg combat operations. That goes for a lot of other tinsel dangling off peacocks like him.

McChrystal is a social liberal. He voted for Obama. He also banned Fox News from his staff headquarters, which is a familiar quality, to my generation, in a staff officer. No unwelcome opinions allowed. Indeed, all the principals in the Obama-McChrystal farce are like that. So when reality works its compensating magic on a bunch of contending liberal fools, our side is winning without much effort.

What happened between Obama and McChrystal? The General seemed to believe that a White House and defense establishment composed of people like himself was a good thing, until it wasn't. The fantasy of liberal administrative competence is held together by the same things that eventually disprove it: Arrogance, ignorance of cause and effect, and plain stupidity.

McChrystal also seemed to believe that he could toot his little bugle to a "Rolling Stone" reporter - impressing the literati with his "out-spokenness" - where his maundering and self-promotion would remain their little secret. This buried the needle on the Stupid-o-meter, and makes you wonder if this jackass belongs on the same continent with sharp-edged paper or kitchen utensils.

Instead of being protected from cuts and punctures on some assignment above The Dew Line, McChrystal was prosecuting the nine-year old war in Afghanistan, which is the liberals' mission to turn a broken land of Islamic Fred Flintstones into a nation of Ty Penningtons. The whole thing would be laughable if it wasn't so lethal.

A century of American death, toil and treasure might raise it to a nation of Islamic Al Bundys, but killing bad guys on the Paki side of the Durand Line and winking at their cousins on the Afghan side won't even raise Haji Flintstone to the next level, which is somewhere around John Conyers. That seems to have been McChrystal's strategy, although I would like to be proved wrong.

Brain-power on Afghanistan isn't scarce. Michael Yon and the crazy, ballsy, super-smart Brit, Rory Stewart, have forgotten more about the region than anyone at The Pentagon knows. But here's the problem. An old saw, which I believe to be true, is that first-rank managers surround themselves with other first-rank people. Second-rank managers prefer the advice and company of third-rank foks, third prefer fourth and so on, in a cascade to incompetence. It's impossible for Obama to surround himself with, or understand, first-rank advisors because he's inexperienced and not particularly bright where it counts.

I'm with Lou Dobbs on the Afghan war. End it. Now. Will we? Obama reached for Petreaus because McChrystal couldn't blow any more smoke around his confusion, escapism and delirium as President, and especially around his loathing for American muscularity and assertiveness wherever it exists. McChrystal did it until his conceits collided with Obama's. Petraeus is different. This should be interesting.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Rhod. I also rely on Yon for my Afghan updates. He's certainly not a fan of McChrystal.

Bush focussed on Iraq and wisely avoided the humiliation of an all-out campaign in Afghanistan.

Since the idiocracy in this nation were taught to believe that Bush's every move was wrong, Obama fixed everything by apologized for our supposed defeat in Iraq and then made Afghanistan the war upon which he would hang his Titlest cap.

Afghanistan will be his millstone.

Anonymous said...

Obama is handling this war with all the grace and hands-on skill of - er - Obama. We are doomed.

TS/WS said...

This just another attempt by the Demos to select the conservatives Presidential candidate; for the mind numb robots.
To use Petreus to repeal don't ask-don't tell.

Anonymous said...

Rhod, I once appeared in the Lead of a production of that work. In deference to my talent, the temporarily re-branded it The Adequate Soldier Schweik.

Rhod said...

I swear, you know everything. It was on a reading list in my freshman year along with The Tin Drum, The Caucasian Chalk Circle, I, Claudius, and others.

Then, as now, Lit profs were lefties.

Lead? Wow.

Anonymous said...

Well, if The Current President had the goal of protecting and defending the USA, then you could certainly make a case that there is incompetence present. I believe that in reality The Current President has the goal of destabilizing the USA to the point where there is widespread collapse; at this he is seemingly purposeful and does not exhibit incompetence.

Rhod said...

Guy, I don't know yet. My first objection to that line of reasoning is this: like economics,no one really knows what holds a complex, diverse society together, least off all the lefty soc sci noodlers who try to quantify and predict individual and group behavior.

Volumes upon volumes have also been written by the same "thinkers" about why societies fall apart, either through gradual dissolution or abrupt revolution.

If Obama and his circle of leftist gangsters are trying to do this, they can certainly induce chaos, but the outcome for them is unpredictable. They're suicidal or crazy, not smart.

Doom said...

The beautiful thing is that the "betrayal" of the general was perpetrated for the very reason you suggest, to get us out of Afghanistan. What has, possibly, happened though, is that the incompetent boob who was playing loose with American military lives and free with liberalism, was pulled and he was the best hope for some kind of defeat on the ground there the left had. Americans will sooner or later tire of the war, which might be right or wrong, but... the chances of catastrophic losses to our soldiers, I think, has just declined greatly.

I guess the left hand of the left never even knows what the left hand of the left... uhrm... is doing. In this way, this was a beautiful debacle. You have to love when a revolutionary brick thrower tosses a brick into the back of the head of one of his own, thinking this will really show the rest of us. Beautiful.

The new General actually might be able to pull some things around. He has the quota in chief by the balls, the quota handed him those in the confusion of the debacle. Michelle must be really unhappy. If they are that detachable, my guess is they were in her purse most of the time. Anyway...

Anonymous said...

Well, here again, some of (if the) best commentary on this subject anywhere. Thank you, Rhod. Outstanding stuff.

I part company only with your agreement with Dobbs. I think it's worthwhile to keep killing bad guys in Afghanistan and elsewhere for as long as we can justify doing so. It's that simple to me. I am not much up for prospects of a "democratic" Afghanistan, much like I wasn't fired up for "liberating the Kuwaiti people." But both wars involve protecting Americans and our interests from those who hate us and have expansionist dreams.

We did the same in your war (that is, we had a poor plan in a difficult environment. Ultimately, it was part of our victory in the Cold War.

Opus #6 said...

Better to fight them there than here.

But lately I have had the feeling we are fighting them here.

Anonymous said...

You're right, Opie. My sentiments, exactly. Because we haven't been fighting them there with the same vigor as previously ... we are fighting them here all the more.

Kid said...

I was a bit surprised Petreaus took the job until I learned he got the ROE changed substantially. This will save a lot of lives and suffering.
Maybe that was all he wanted. He's going to be at the mercy of the democrat run media anyway so why not grab a big slice for the troops.

Outside of that, Afghanistan will never have a central government imo and therefore the winning strategy in Iraq has no application in Af. The folks there are little more than moving targets.

Time to go. Let them build up their machine, then blanket the skies with B52's again.

Rhod said...

Wash. Rinse. Repeat. I think that was the Colin Powell Doctrine.

As the kid said, blanket the skies with B52's every time the Islamist scum congeals somewhere. You don't need 100,000 troops for that.

To hell with nation-building. We equivocate on that issue when our policy simply ought to be: wherever two or more of you gather in Bin Laden's name, he's there and you're dead.

Simplicity itself.

Rhod said...

And, btw, Al Qaeda is establishing itself in lots of other places. They're like termites.

The Rattler - III said...

Drones! We need more drones! Then we won't need any more generals. Just hook them all up to a big screen in the white house... and direct them in between tee times.

Subvet said...

No war can be won with a highly publicized deadline. Period. The enemy only has to lay low long enough with the expectation of our departure to focus on. Until then we're just sacrificing good men and women for the sake of feeling like we're really doing something.

Screw that. Our military deserves better. If we can't fight to win with whatever it takes (no idiotic ROE) for however long it takes than we owe it to the troops to pull them out of there and let the place go to Hell.

The followers of the Pedophile Prophet are already here, as proven by the Times Square Bomber, the Ft. Hood shooter, the Christmas BVD Bomber, etc. So the idea of fighting them over there vice here won't wash either.

Let them all go to Hell and let's focus on getting our country back from the libtards. After that we can run a steamroller over our enemies.

The Rattler - III said...

Yah... what Subvet said.

Rhod said...

Now you did it, Rattler. He's gonna say "Yah...what Rattler said".

Starsplash said...

When you make an alliance with crooks and the time comes for the requirement of the crooks to repent and change thier ways, you will find that you have to kill them because they don't want to repent and will rebel instead.