Pages

April 9, 2016

Water Grab

There is no doubt about this one; it is a UN political move solely calculated on how much they can steal or extort from Western nations.

With well-armed troops on the ground the UN couldn't do a thing to protect more than 500,000 Tutsi's from being slaughtered in 1994, but they'll go to the mat for a sardine.
The United Nations has launched a far-reaching initiative that could give U.N.-sponsored authorities sway over the biological resources of the high seas—all the waters that lie outside national territories and economic zones.
Here's the kicker. There's more money at stake here than you can shake a Tutsi at, if you can find one.

This comes on the heels of 11 million documents that were leaked from a Panama law office showing how the world's leaders hide their fortunes that they stole from their constituents. When it comes to murder and larceny, there are no bigger criminals than those who control their governments.
The potential shift in power involves multi-trillion-dollar issues, such as whether large areas—conceivably, as much as 30 percent-- of the world’s international waters should be designated as no-go areas to protect biological diversity; whether and how to require elaborate “environmental impact assessments” for future ocean development projects; and how to divide up the economic benefits from the future development of “marine genetic resources.”

Eden Charles, a diplomat from Trinidad and Tobago who is serving as the chairman for a U.N. preparatory committee that began the discussions this week underlined to Fox News that the talks are at a “very, very preliminary stage.”
Yeah, I'm gonna let some asshole from Tobago determine how much I pay for a can of tuna.

This is all environmental/social justice bullshit. You can read more here from a speech he delivered to the UN in 2014. It's not only about sustainable development, it's also about delivering technology and industrial capacity to under developed nations; you know, those countries where if their leaders don't sell a competing tribe into slavery, they eat them.
Overall, the hoped-for treaty will cover “two-thirds of the oceans, almost half the planet,” says Lisa Speer, a senior official of the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which is in turn a lead member of a squadron of 33 environmentalist groups banded together as the High Seas Alliance to lobby for protectionist measures during the talks.
And there you go. Thirty-three groups of self-styled saviors who don't bathe in order to save the planet will dictate policy governing much of the planet's surface.

3 comments:

Doom said...

They have been trying to push this through for a very long time. I am honestly surprised they haven't done it. Though, truth be told, you can claim the moon. But if you can't defend it, your claim means nothing. I am pretty sure countries will not go to war for the UN. Sure, they'll send troops for a rape and theft fest. But they won't risk their crowns, positions, power, or money for it.

What needs to happen is the UN needs to be cut and parted. They tried this before, it failed just as well. Only that one was allowed to die the death it deserved. I suppose, with women voting in numbers, these types of politicians have learned that they can still make a hefty living through fearmongering and lies. Actually, the UN, the Fed, centralizing power... all of that really... while it existed before, it never lasted. Since women started to vote those things are now standard issue.

Kid said...

Same as it ever was. How anyone can believe someone is interested in someone else''s welfare is the problem.

It's a feeding frenzy of theft and self-gratification.

Woodsterman (Odie) said...

The New Religion has many denominations. Wet Green Peace.