August 21, 2016

Huma Huma Huma Chameleon

More vindication of the story that Hillary's right hand wench is an Islamist agent.

From the NY Post:
Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.

[...]In a separate January 1996 article, Abedin’s mother — who was the Muslim World League’s delegate to the UN conference — wrote that Clinton and other speakers were advancing a “very aggressive and radically feminist” agenda that was un-Islamic and wrong because it focused on empowering women.

“‘Empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men,” Saleha Mahmood Abedin maintained, while forcefully arguing in favor of Islamic laws that have been roundly criticized for oppressing women.
This is the baggage Hillary wants to tote into the White House.

Huma supports the "women are property" aspect of Islam and her husband likes to tweet dick pics to strange women.

Scratch these people and they bleed radical, anti-American bullshit.


Kid said...

Well of course. If there is a buck in it, the obama, clinton and all the rest are for it no matter how it damages America.

Doom said...

Here again, though, a choice. Americans decided, or really the courts, lawyers, and legislators... decided that men and women didn't own each other, so creating no-fault divorces. Then created an unconstitutional, actually not even law based, family court system. Which has been stacked by feminists and their ideals. To a lot of people, including women who were taken in by the idea of easy money then lost it all? Sharia actually looks better.

You know your nation has gone astray when private surveys regarding personal happiness are taken, and women under sharia law come out more satisfied with their life in general. So... just... saying Sig. We don't have a lot to say on this topic.

Is there a middle ground? I think there was. I think it was run over and passed as quickly as the left to get over it. And I don't think government or police involvement is the way, obviously. As bad as it might be, some things, including just about all family affairs, need to be left to the family and church, only involving criminal when a murder takes place... and not always even then.

The choice is secular, which crushes family, sharia which crushes women, or the old way. Family can suck, but it's your own suckage, not something imposed. At least that is how I see it. Thankfully, for many, or so many think, I don't have a voice in America.

Kid said...

Doom, women under sharia express satisfaction because they have no choice.

Like POW's in deplorable circumstances learn to like it because it is what lets them survive. ?