September 14, 2012

The King Of Peace vs The Religion Of Peace

What follows is a well conceived article regarding the danger that Islam poses to a post-Christian America. While America was strong in her beliefs, Islam was laughable; Muslims were called "Mohammedans" during the nineteenth century and were rightfully viewed as heathen savages because of the vicious practices exercised under the direction of their insane Prophet.

Islamic and Christian spheres of influence were stable for centuries once the Ottomans were removed from Europe. These boundaries remained virtually unchanged due to the strength of Christianity's champions, Europe and America.

Europe and America are no longer strong in this respect.  Moral values that have been revered for millenia have been abandoned for relativistic emptiness where nothing means everything and everything means nothing.

Nature abhors a vacuum, even a spiritual one. Sharia Law has taken advantage of this. As Jesus states in Matthew 12: 43-45
“When an unclean spirit goes out of a man, he goes through dry places, seeking rest, and finds none. Then he says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when he comes, he finds it empty, swept, and put in order.

Then he goes and takes with him seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter and dwell there; and the last state of that man is worse than the first. So shall it also be with this wicked generation.”

Do not be deceived - Islam is a demonic belief system. It is inspired by Satan and administered by unclean spirits.  How does this demonic cult manifest itself?

It enslaves women and non-believers.
It will kill you for not obeying its Prophet..
It will kill you for offending its Prophet.
It will kill you on a rumor that you have offended its Prophet.
It will kill you for being a Jew.

Islam is spiritual slavery and death cloaked under the guise of holiness.

 It has taken hold in Europe and is slowly replacing the remnants of the sadly decayed Christian moral system found there. Modern relativistic eyes see nothing wrong with this and because they refuse to see the spiritual battle taking place, they are blind to the real endgame of Islam. How the media can ignore the cruelty of Islam is beyond me. ABC, CBS, NBS, CNN - they are all Satan's tools.

Sharia Law can and will happen here with the willing assistance of our main stream media who on one hand hide the atrocities committed under the name of the Prophet and on the other malign Christianity.

Now let Mr. Bell speak:
ON 9/11 LET US REMEMBER THAT Islam is War. It has been at war, overtly or covertly since its founder, the “prophet” Mohammed, spread his “religion” through warfare, and became the head of state. Islam is about control, conquest and domination. Islam is war. And what is the first casualty in war? The first casualty in war is the truth. Islam is deception. Even a huge percentage of the followers of Islam are deceived as to what it really is. We have a word for such people and that word is, “Moderate Muslims”.

And according to Islam, Muslims are not only allowed to deceive for the sake of Islam, they are commanded to do so. In Islam there is no right and wrong – only that which is commanded and that which is forbidden. Islam has no golden rule, no conscience. The very word itself, Islam, means submission. If this belief system were a human being, it would have the mind of a rapist. Islam gets off on making you submit. You don’t have to like it. You don’t have to convert. You just have to submit.

A non-Muslim is a second-class citizen called a Kafir. You and I are Kafirs. Much of the Koran concerns itself with the Kafir – how to control us, to subjugate us and to kill us. Islam has the mind of a psychopathic rapist and because its founder, the “prophet” Mohammed was in fact a psychopathic rapist himself. Islam was spread through rape. Women were raped by Muslims when a town was seized by Islam. Mohammed ordered this and participated in this. Islam was spread by rapists. Mohammed even raped a child who was only 9 years old.

The Islamic scripture mentions, over 90 times, that Mohammed is the highest moral example. Mohammed personally tortured other human beings, he was a thief, a pedophile, a man who annihilated Jews for Allah, a man who ordered the stoning of women, the beheading of his critics, a man who beat his wives and who forced a woman to marry him, after killing her husband, father, brothers and her entire tribe.

Islam is a criminal enterprise, using lies about hell and Paradise to manipulate its masses. Islam is terrorism. The “prophet” Mohammed said, “Strike terror into the hearts of the unbelievers” and “I have become victorious through terror”. Islam is terrorism. The civilized people on planet Earth seek to evolve. It’s what we have done over time, and it’s what we seek to continue to do. Civilized people evolve. But Islam forbids critical thinking. Instead, Islam demands that we all follow Islamic Law – the Sharia. You have one freedom under Sharia and that is the freedom to follow the Sharia.

Islam seeks to take away your freedoms and mine. It is a 1,400 year old human rights nightmare which must not continue. Today, as I remember all of those innocent souls who lost their lives on 9/11, because of Islam, I reaffirm my commitment to fight Islam until it is destroyed and it is destroyed completely.

Islam and human rights cannot coexist. Islam and Liberty cannot coexist. Islam and America cannot coexist. We must end Sharia in our time. And if we are to evolve and to survive, as a species on this planet, we must wipe out Islam entirely. We must destroy Islam completely. The slightest trace of this Cancer called Islam will try to grow back. The civilized world, which is superior to Islam in every way, simply cannot afford that.
One way or another, we all choose our fate.
Deuteronomy 11:26-28
Behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse; a blessing, if ye obey the commandments of the Lord your God, which I command you this day: and a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of the Lord your God, but turn aside out of the way which I command you this day, to go after other gods, which ye have not known.


Opus #6 said...

Excellent post. Tweeted the link to it just now.

Gerboh Flugheim said...

The history of religion is long and mutable. Though we like to believe that our religion (whatever that may be) is a constant, in fact it has changed repeatedly over the centuries. Christians were originally meek, and were killed en masse by the Romans. Then Christianity became the state religion, and it was used for wars, including the Crusades. You can cry about Muslims executing infidels, but the Christian Church burned heretics at the stake with regularity for centuries. Given time Islam will liberalize too. Right now women in Iran want western clothing and to wear their dresses short, and the men want western dance music and guitars. In Saudi Arabia the women are trying to get rights previously off limits. Their leaders are fighting a losing battle in the long run.

Whose side are you on, the mullahs or the people? You seem to be siding with the mullahs.

Today Mitt Romney criticized this "Innocence of the Muslims" film, saying we should be respectful of other religions. So will you not be voting for him now?

sig94 said...

Gerboh - you make the common mistake of equating Christianity with organized religion. Religion and government together (also sometimes a theocracy such as Islam and Old Testament Israel) is a heady, dangerous admixture that far too often results in bloody struggles for control of men rather than spiritual struggles for men's souls.

Christianity is a relationship with Christ. Period. There is no New Testament allowance for religious control other than the local congregation. Everything else is man's interpretation of what he thinks God wants. Not to upset our Catholic brethren, but Paul's confession of faith was the key, not Paul himself.

If you understood this you wouldn't have bothered with the tired old babble that you posted above.

sig94 said...

Opus - thank you.

Subvet said...

Sig94, Christians of all stripes should recall Mk 9: 38-41. We'd be a lot more tolerant of each other. I had a lot of nuns who would have benefited from a dose of tolerance.

Gerboh, you need to go back and read some history. Start with the Crusades which were DEFENSIVE wars against Muslim incursion. As for the witch trials, the Inquisition burned nobody. Zip, zero, nada. Read some history and you'll discover witches were examined by the Inquisition which then handed those deemed guilty over to the SECULAR authorities. Were mistakes made? Certainly. Here, let me help you out by listing two reprehensible examples: the trial of the Knights Templar and that of Joan of Arc. Both were travesties. Both were repudiated by the Pope once an investigation was launched and those investigations were instigated by adherents to the Church.

On the flip side, check out the origins of hospitals and universities. Those didn't just spring into being.

Nothing comparable of any beneficial nature has come from Islam. It's a satanic inspired cult whose "Prophet" was a blood thirsty, thieving pedophile. Even his own wives remarked on how his "god" seemed to favor him and let him do whatever he damned well wanted. Again, check the histories.

sig94 said...

Subvet - right on. Christ's message was that of peace and reconciliation to God, not of conquest and subjugation of so called "inferior" races and gender.

banned said...

That forgot the "Throw the homosexual off the mountainside".

I was in London during most of "The Troubles" in Ireland (which sometimes reached London itself) but never regarded the actions of the IRA as representing the nation or people of Ireland, many of whose sons were personal friends.

The voters of Libya roundly rejected Islamist parties, just as the Irish repeatedly rejected the political wing of said IRA and your US Marines/FBI investigation may well find that the murder of your Ambassador was carried out by fringe lunatics or indeed foreigners.

I have some sympathy for part of what Gerboh Flugheim says given that European Catholics and Protestants were regularly burning each other just three or four centuries ago. Give them time!

Sectarianism is alive and well in Scotland to this day btw, especially in Glasgow.

banned said...

@Subvet, the French like to bang on about Joan Of Arc but it was their secular authorities that handed her over to the English ecclesiastical court (cf Jews, Jesus, Herod) to be dealt with (she was burned for wearing trousers btw).

sig94 said...

banned - that would make good sense about the Libyans, however the de facto gov't (the UK) chased and hounded the IRA. I doubt very much we are likely to see the Libyan government go after these murders with the same enthusiasm. As far as the FBI and Marines investigating these crimes ... I also doubt that they will have any meaningful role.

And I am still looking for the bible reference about throwing homosexuals off the mountainside, or was that some other writing? Curious to know how that crept in there.

Subvet said...

Banned, actually she was captured by the English after a French noble abandoned her. As I recall, she was fighting outside the gates of a city the noble commanded and he refused to allow her to retreat to safety. The newly coronated French king, known for eliminating anyone he felt made him look bad by comparison, did diddle squat in trying to secure her release.

Her confinement and trial violated most of the norms for women prisoners. The trousers you mention were worn as a method of discouraging rape. The jailers were all men (one of the violations just noted) instead of women as called for by the norms for trying female heretics. Known as "The Maid" a loss of her virginity would have only given more credibility to the charges against her, with no chance of escaping certain death.

The Catholic Church moves with glacial slowness in these affairs so it's noteworthy that her conviction was repealed and her name cleared barely 25 years later.

sig94 said...

Subvet & Banned - thank you both for your efforts & comments on this. As we dig deeper we perhaps still do not come to mutually acceptable conclusions, but it sure opens the eyes of those of us who are watching on the sidelines.

banned said...

@Sig94 It was intended as an addition to the
It enslaves women and non-believers.... list, I can't give you chapter and verse but I have seen it referred to many times.

@Subvet, thank you for that, it was my understanding that the only charge against her that went all the way to conviction was that regarding the trousers( compulsorily ot not).