Hat Tip to Big Journalism
There are many things on the World Wide Web that are not suitable for public viewing but that should be required viewing for journalists and political figures to alert them to the horrors that exist in some parts of the world. This should not be to incite but rather to rinse away their naïveté in dealing with a hostile culture and our potential enemies.
It is apparent that the mainstream media has no interest in covering stories that shed an unfavorable side of Islam and, frankly, this smacks of cowardice.
The elite will instead claim that the “vast majority” of Muslims are peace-loving and are just as horrified at the acts of a small number of radical terrorists. That may very well be true but even a fraction of a billion is a very large number and that number is growing and gaining influence around the world thanks to the stupidity and cowardice of what should be called the “lamestream” press and those in our government today.
The Internet bloggers are doing the nasty job of covering the world of Islamic jihadists and it is truly chilling. The video of Daniel Pearl’s beheading could not be shown on the public airwaves but was easily available on the web. Gruesome as it was it cannot compare with this video of children training for Jihad beheading a man all the while praising Allah.
This video is shown on a site that monitors the growing influence of the radicals and frankly I had no stomach to watch more than a second of the film. As is noted here: “It’s the next generation of mujahideen who are expected to fight and kill infidels to establish global Islamic rule.”
There must be a special place in hell for those who corrupt the mind of a child and teach him to hate in the name of God.
Sharia law is now being accepted in British Courts. And I’d like to know why the feminist groups aren’t railing against this Koranic weapon against Muslim women. Sharia law permits honor killings and other atrocities against them and we are supposed to accept this as legitimate? Are we as nutty as the Brits?
Phyllis Chesler is a renowned feminist who earned the scorn of NOW and other groups when she admitted her support for George Bush. She knew first hand what happens to women under Islamic law as a young bride married to an Afghan and is appalled at the lack of reporting on this issue. Writing for pajamasmedia.com she is doing the job our press is neglecting.
27 comments:
Wow.. that's amazing that the Brits have sanctioned Sharia law under the rubrick of binding arbitration. I could see this very easily happening here and its damn frightening. Are there Christian groups that offer binding arbitration? (that might mess up the church-state thing, which doesn't likely apply to Islam). When will the insanity end?
If you can stand to watch the video your question will be answered.
I did watch the video, and also the one of the kid beheading a man. I know where its going to go; my question was rhetorical. such things aren't new and have been consistently practiced for thousands of years. Only recently has the value of life been elevated above cockroaches in the Western world. Self-preservation will need to take as extreme a form as muslims care to take it.
Sharia Law is not healthy for women and other living things.
Sharia law was sneaked in behind the British public's backs by our glorious Lefty Labour surrender monkeys, Nickie, which I'm sure you already know. The public have no desire to see this unacceptable abomination anywhere in the Country, but, as usual, Brown has done exactly as he wished, as slyly as he could, coward that he is, to undermine and eventually destroy our national identity and the rule of law. Given enough time, I have no doubt that Obama and his mottley crew will try to and the same to you.
My personal campaign on my blog for the last few years, warning of the dangers of Islam has gone unheeded by all but a few readers. I've always held the belief that once the % of Muslims in the population reaches critical mass(5%), then there is no turning back the tide.This is the situation in UK and the introduction of Sharia Law is just one example of the influence of Muslims once their numbers reach critical mass within the population.
When mentioning Muslim and critical mass in the same sentence, you should also say Minuteman 3. Puts all your ducks in a proper row.
"Are we as nutty as the Brits?"
I wouldn't say we are "nutty" for accepting this. The simple truth is that the existence of Sharia Courts has no direct effect on the lives of non-Muslims or those moderate more integrated Muslims. The law of England and Wales takes precedent.
The fact that we are not noisily standing up for our Muslim sisters and how their lives might be affected by these courts? To my mind that's the bigger issue.
Velcro, I'm no attorney but I'm pretty sure British and American law is based on legal precedent. Once Sharia law becomes part of legal decisions, Cambridge Lady's dream of "no direct effect" becomes a tragic naive joke.
Zio, that video is difficult to stomach.
Sharia law "has no jurisdiction in England and Wales"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8406796.stm
I'm not a lawyer either though :S
Opie, it's quite healthy for the parasites attempting to co-opt western civilization.
Spider... I'm waiting for Obama's numbers to sink to Brown's level.
Lexcen, change is now in the hands of the people. Government can no longer be trusted with the task.
Lady, that BBC link substantiates my worst fears. The thin edge of the fascist wedge.
Bottom line - Shariah Law has no business in America. We have our own law. If someone wants to immigrate here they should be prepared to accept our law - not the other way around. Why England has chosen to abandon their own culture is a mystery to me, but I dare say they are in serious trouble in that country. And might I add, that I fear we are not far behind them!
Hoping... if the Libs go belly-up for sharia law, it will happen.
"Why England has chosen to abandon their own culture is a mystery to me"
"Hoping.." - We already have Jewish courts in the UK. Are you proposing we should ban them?? I certainly wouldn't wish to.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7233040.stm
BTW, before the insults start ...... I'm not saying that I approve of all aspects of Sharia Law - many things disturb me about it. I'm just pointing out that in a fair and free country you can't allow one religion to have its own courts and deny that right to another. UK law will never allow things like honour killing to be regarded as legal.
Somebody tell Obama we owe these children an apology.
I couldn't bear to watch the video. Just the description makes me despair for humanity.
What I would love to do, which I know we never could, is to take the children of known terrorists and raise them as Jews and Christians. Let the jihadists know that if you attack us or even plot to, we will turn your children into everything you despise.
If we're ever going to win we have to find a price they're not willing to pay. Maybe that would be it, but probably not.
And all of this because one woman didn't trust in God and encouraged her husband to sleep with her handmaiden. And the man did it.
Cambridge - All my opinion, but NO religion should have their own law, nevermind multiple religions. What a mess that's got to be to reconcile. Law should be made by the governing body of the country, subject to acceptance by it's people.
CL - How could you honestly equate a Jewish court -or Any Other- to a sharia court. Maybe you simply don't know what is being discussed here.
When you read of or see a teenage girl being stoned down by Kings Cross for the crime of being raped, it will come crashing in on you.
These bits are not exceptions. They are not 'urban legend'. These 3rd century vermin are the lowest thing on the food chain. I wouldn't insult animals by calling them animals.
Kid, of course I know what's being discussed here (!!) and I am not comparing what happens in Sharia Law to Jewish Law - merely pointing out there is a precedent for having religious courts in the UK and to deny Muslims (many of whom are moderate in the UK) their own court for non-criminal matters would be inconsistent and discriminatory.
"When you read of or see a teenage girl being stoned down by Kings Cross for the crime of being raped, it will come crashing in on you. "
There are already people from all faiths who are prepared to take the law into their own hands - extremists and fundamentalists of all faiths. British law will deal with them. Few people, including all my Muslim friends, are going to accept the situation you describe.
I would agree there are some Muslims who do not wish to integrate into British society. There are many many more who enjoy living here, take part in our traditions and culture, and who practise their religion in a non-intrusive way. Should I tell my children to shun their Muslim friends? Should I break off contact with my loyal Muslim friends of ten years who have been there for me through thick and thin and whose company I enjoy (and religious differences barely get a mention......).
I just want peace. If we reject those Muslims who are on the side of peace we risk radicalising them as well - and then we have a much bigger problem.
Just my perspective.
CL - I believe that if the UK gives them their own court for even as little as hearing cases of bad hair days, it will blossom into full blown sharia law spreading across the UK. This is how it's done. Nothing ever just shows up 'tomorrow'. Always a generational process. Don't let them get a foot in the door is my advice.
This is why conservatives are fighting obama socialism efforts. It's not that the US would be socialized in a couple years, but we see that accepting certain things now will inevitably lead to it and there will be no way to stop it at that point. Natl Health Care being an incredibly large part - that once enacted would be irreversible for decades if at all.
I wasn't talking about people taking the law into their own hands. I was talking about people executing sentences handed down by perfectly accepted UK sharia courts if the Church of England's prediction comes true. Difference. These people would be legally going about their business. Then maybe it's not long before Englanders end up in sharia courts. Couple decades? Imagine that. Your nephew's son has his hand cut off for stealing a piece of candy when he's 5 at some point in the future..
I would not suggest shunning any Muslim. Just any effort to assimilate the UK rather than they assimilating to the UK culture.
Post a Comment