Posted at Yid With a Lid
This has to be the scariest thing I have read in a very long time. The Rand Corporation was asked by the US Army to prepare a report recommending whether or not the US Needed a National Stability Police force. Basically a call for American "Brown Shirts". Rand's answer was a resounding yes.
Our analysis clearly indicates that the United States needs an SPF or some other way to accomplish the SPF mission. Stability operations have become an inescapable reality of U.S. foreign policy. Establishing security with soldiers and police is critical because it is difficult to achieve other objectives—such as rebuilding political and economic systems—without it.
The cost of not fixing this gap is significant. The United States will continue to experience major challenges in stability operations if it does not have this policing capacity. These challenges include creating the ability to establish basic law and order, as well as defeat or deter criminal organizations, terrorists, and insurgents. In some cases, allied countries may be able to fill this gap. Allies did this effectively in Bosnia and Kosovo, both of which were successful in establishing security. In other cases, the United States may not be able to count on allied support. The United States should not depend on allies to supply these capabilities, because doing so would limit U.S. freedom of action on the international stage. Consequently, the United States should seriously consider building a high-end police capacity.
The report recommends that these police would not only have a role in foreign lands but also in the United States:
The ability of SPF personnel to act in a law –– enforcement capacity while in the United States. One important aspect of the return on investment from an SPF option is what SPF personnel do when not deployed. Given that an SPF will be deployed one out of every three years at most for active duty options and one out of six for reserve options, whether its members can perform law enforcement functions and so contribute to domestic tranquility and homeland defense when not deployed will have a major impact on whether an option is cost-effective. Two categories of options—military units and contractors—cannot do so under current statutes and regulations.
In particular, for the MP option to be as cost-effective as possible, relief from the Posse Comitatus Act [which forbids the US Army from being used in law enforcement in the United States] would be required to permit its members to perform domestic law enforcement functions. The issue of contractors performing law enforcement functions is moot (our only “contracting” option does not consider a standing contract force, but rather one hired as needed) and would probably be insurmountable if it was not. Furthermore, as noted in our DOTMLPF discussion, working as police officers would greatly contribute to the state of training and readiness of SPF personnel. MPs can do this on military installations, but contract personnel would not so act at all.
The report goes on to say that this Stability Police Force should be placed under the US Marshal Service because that will make it easier for it to have domestic US responsibilities.
I wonder what kind of Domestic Role the Stability Police can have, controlling Tea Parties? "Fixing" Fox News? A national police under the control of this or any president will do nothing less than signal the end of freedom in the United States.Given that it is unlikely that MPs would be permitted to perform civilian policing tasks in the United States, the USMS, despite its capacity and management shortfalls, is the agency best suited to take on the SPF mission under the assumptions of this study. Placing the SPF in the USMS would place it where its members can develop the needed skills under the hybrid staffing option. Furthermore, the USMS has the broadest law enforcement mandate of any U.S. law enforcement agency and many of the required skills, though it would need to increase its capacity significantly. Furthermore,the Department of Justice stands at the center of the rule-of-law effort, with lead roles in policing, judiciary, and corrections efforts.
Click here to read the rest and view the Rand document
35 comments:
Holy Mother of God. What is happening to my country.
Spinster... That's exactly my sentiment. We must keep up the battle by making this information known.
Dear Lord, Nickie, I hate to say it, but it really looks like the end time Bible prophecies are coming, like NOW! Thanks for posting this.
We just have to pray extra hard, because despite what all these heathens would like to do to destroy our Nation, it was Founded on God, and God will protect it and Israel.
This is not good. Not good at all. The handwriting is on the wall. Now is the time to start screaming bloody murder before these idiots use the rest of TARP and Stimulus funding to throw a half million brown shorts into the streets.
Here is the link to the FBI's UCR,
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_74.html
which gives the 2008 national LEA employment numbers.
There are a little over 700,000 cops in the USA today. When I retired in 1998 from my PD, there were 641,000 cops nationwide and that was after Clinton's 1994 COPS hiring program (which I oversaw for my department - we had three rounds of new hires under this funding for about 20 cops).
The numbers are creeping up. That's almost a 10% increase in 11 years.
A US Marshal makes between $27,000 and $34,000 a year; use $30,500 as the median. To hire 50,000 new cop/marshals/whatever will initially cost $1.5 billion plus fringe which is hard to estimate if ObamaCare goes into effect - they'll hide the true costs. Payroll tax will be about 11% ($168 million), pension and health/dental maybe another 25% ($382 million)- call it $2 billion for 50,000 national cops. So for $21 billion, the Obamabots get their half million brownshirts.
Double that and there's a million extra cops to play with you. Crime is on the down tick, they'll be bored. You know they'll be looking to stabilize something.
As of this month, only $257 billion of the $787 billion stimulus package was spent, leaving $530 billion for the pols to play with. Anyone want to bet how this plays out?
The US military recruits from only 30% of the population. This is because the other 70% is "undesireable" because of drugs, moral lapses, physical conditioning, etc.
Guess which section of the population the new stabilization officers will be recruited from? Undoubtably they will also be unionized. SEIU with guns and soft body armor.
This is not a certainty, but the funding is in place already and we already know the desire to create such a force exists.
Jesse Venture has a new show.
I watch on TRU.
He talked to a group that has all the security contracts from DHS.
Noticed the "Group". Some of you work in a Corporation that is possibly in the "Group".
Komrad Nickoli -- Dear Leader is only follow Komrad Lenin's playbook. Funny how this falls with the Executive order signed yesterday. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/2010executive_order.pdf
Maybe it may be a precursor to Chucky Schummer and Barn Franks push for universal voter registration and what may come to pass after the election fraud coming with the help of ACORN.
But, I could be wrong. He is most likely just boasting up national defence against the "foreign" threats. Komrad sharky
P.S. Not just Security Co. either-ANY Co.
Did any of the post have ideas that sound like this?
"The SS formations were unique in that the Reich leadership did not originally consider them front line combat formations. As early as 1936, the Reichsfuhrer SS, Heinrich Himmler described the mission of the SS, "The task of the SS is to guarantee the security of Germany from the interior, just as the Wehrmacht guarantees the safety of the honor, the greatness, and the peace of the Reich from the exterior." However, while Adolf Hitler described the Waffen SS as first and foremost, "an elite police, capable of crushing any adversary," he further recognized that his political army had to prove itself in combat in order to maintain its prestige."
http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/articles/waffenss.aspx
See also second paragraph;
http://books.google.com/books?id=-KEtPlNQJNgC&pg=PA198&lpg=PA198&dq=hitler+waffen+ss+create+police&source=bl&ots=dW1KCKKKjY&sig=YIEmdQhis9H1TffKiqSQobBAmYM&hl=en&ei=aTpNS7ikCdG5lAeDjYGODQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CB4Q6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=hitler%20waffen%20ss%20create%20police&f=false
Civilian security force? You Betcha...But I digress. Back to the REALLY important news.
...So, who do you think will win American Idol this year?
Bunni, I agree. This is troubling stuff.
The battle lines are getting drawn.
sig, you have a knack for drawing conclusions that leave me staring into space.
There's a part of me that believes that all these developments are just coincidences.
That part is getting smaller every day.
TSWS, I'm guessing that Conservative Bloggers are not one of those groups.
Sharky, all the pieces seem to be falling into place.
Toasty, I'm hoping the citizenry wakes up to this before we end up goose-strpping in honor of Chairman Soros.
And, Dad, it looks like it's gonna be a long ugly battle.
Sent a serious chill up my spine. I gotta echo your comment Spinster.
This is the downside of the military industrial complex Ike warned us about.
They should deploy this force to DC so they can start cracking heads. That's the most unstable place in the US...
creeeeepy indeed....sadly most people will think 'this could never happen here in the good old USA'.....all the while it is happening and has been happening for some time now.....
And what is the biggest driving force in the market of "Take Your Freedom To Protect You? FEAR rather than sense. The non-thinkers will be convinced that our present circumstances warrant such unheard of revocation on freedoms long held sacred.
As LL says, this is all part of the Daily Outrage of the Obama Administration.
At least your marxist fascists are pretending to act under the rule of law. Our police just make it up as they go along, despite the European Court Of Human Rights trying to save us from ourselves.
UK Daily Telegraph 12th Jan
"This morning the news broke that the European Court of Human Rights had ruled that stop and search powers were illegal. This afternoon, the Home Office announced that it was planning to appeal.
But this wasn’t simply a case of the law being misapplied by an over-zealous plod. What is interesting about today’s judgment is that the ECHR found that the law itself lacked “adequate legal safeguards”."
Chicken, all our spines are chilled. These are the developments we thought we'd never see in America.
Silverfish, these forces will be deployed to quiet the troubled masses. And there's gonna be plenty of troubled masses.
"The non-thinkers will be convinced that our present circumstances warrant such unheard of revocation on freedoms long held sacred."
CUB, you are so right. The deployments will be announced between prime time shows...
"President Obama today announced moves to end civil unrest. 2,000 members of the president's Negotiation Force will be arriving in Little Rock this evening. Film at 11."
Opie, they seem to be moving full speed ahead while the window of opportunity is still open.
I don't believe Brown has a chance to win in Massachusetts. If that election is even close, the Democrat machine will deliver the victory to their candidate. They can't afford not to. Don't forget all the Massachusetts voters who were mobilized to turn the New Hampshire primary.
Banned, I hope you folks will be able to salvage some of your rights after New Labour has done their worst. Cameron certainly doesn't sound like he has much to add.
I'll know fortunes have turned in the UK when you get an EU referendum.
King Arthur tried for the session of Wales; and the elimination of Heredity to the Throne. I expect to see another ploy to save the Brits. He wants to be recognized as the Returned King that will save the People.
Although there is a little problem.
Diana raised William to think he is King Arthur and she-his Lady of The Lake.
It will be very interesting to see this played out!
Could this be the "Civilian National Security Force" then-candidate BO proposed during the campaign. I did a post on something like this back in March. Sound like it to you????
http://tclblogger.blogspot.com/2009/03/give-servebuilding-obama-civilian-army.html
Before you folks get too fired up, you might want to find out when this report was requested by the military. It's published date is certainly not when it was commissioned. The fact that the costs are figured in 2007 dollars would indicate this report was commissioned and begun at least two years ago - maybe even three years ago. Tea Parties did not exist then. So it would be a stretch to think the SPF was designed to keep them in line.
The Feds have been for years trying to find a way to create something like this. So far the only place it has ever existed is in reports and conjecture like this. It is worth watching, but hardly worth worrying about until such time as the report is acted on.
TSWS... it'll be played out in the pages of the Sun.
Lady, that's exactly what I've been thinking.
Yep. BO is selective about which campaign promises he keeps, but this was one. Remember the "civilian security force that's just as well-funded, just as well-trained" as our military?
This is beyond belief. And why is no one stopping it? This is WAY out of bounds. Way.
"Before you folks get too fired up..."
I know, I know, it's Bush's fault. For the hundredth million time. It does not matter if the Demo-rats or the Repubs are the ones who came up with this. Both are VERY nervous about the natives at this point, and the elites are going to do whatever it takes to stay in power. Demo-rat or Rebpub be damned.
If we wait to get "fired up", we will get "fired up" just about the time the Einsatzgruppen shows up to invite us to a muddy ditch party. A party where they will Fire us up. With bullets.
What is it going to take you type to get "fired up". You loved ones disappeared? No food for your children? You property taken for the benefit of those who voted the "right" way? Summery executions? The one party rule of Demo-rats? By the time the disinterested get "fired up" they will be inhabiting a shallow grave. Not he time to finally get your ducks in a row.
Legal action now. Vote. Badger your Congress creatures. Get friends and family involved. NOW.
Moderate attitudes are starting to become a liability. If you want to sit by and wait for the castle to crumble, be my guest. Just stop telling those who have their eyes open to not get "fired up" just because you cannot.
Do I seem too radical? Maybe it is my backround of military history. Specializing in the study the fall of the Weimar Republic and the rise of the Third Reich. So many things are in play right NOW that lead to that horror show. We Americans CAN stop the madness. But to do so we need to get "fired up".
<--- fired up and mad as hell.
Our local police are doing just fine, thank you !
I'm with you Toaster! I hope Americans wake up to what's at stake here!
Post a Comment