Pages

March 9, 2012

Call It What It Is - Treason


Perhaps one of the most incredible acts of treasonous fraud in the history of the United States has been documented by law enforcement and there is no response from the American media. Instead we hear it from the Russkies:

A singularly remarkable event has taken place in the United States of America. This event occurred in Arizona on March 1st and was an earth shattering revelation.

A long awaited press conference was given by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, a five time elected Sheriff, which should have made national and international headlines. Arpaio's credentials include serving in the United States Army from 1950 to 1953, service as a federal narcotics agent serving in countries all over the world with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), and served as the head of the Arizona DEA. Without doubt, this is a serious Law Enforcement Officer, not one to be taken in by tin-foil-hat wearing loons.

Yet, in the five days since his revelations there has been little in the way of serious reporting on the findings he presented in his presser. With 6 short videos, the Sheriff and his team presented a devastating case, one the tame US press is apparently unable to report.
Virtual silence from the US media on this event. Can you imagine the media hysteria if this accusation by a law enforcement official was made against President Bush? Instead, we are treated to the media hyperventilating over some remarks made by a radio talk show host.

The video clip below is the full press conference. It is well over an hour long and reports the technical findings regarding Obama's long form birth certificate and selective service card. Both documents are patently forged.

While watching this video, bear in mind that this is more or less a grand jury presentation assembled by experts. The procedures used by these investigators are forensically correct. They are presenting probable cause that a crime has been committed by the President of the United States assisted by an as yet unidentified constellation of co-conspirators.



What is really amazing about this? Rank amateurs assembled a forgery and the President foisted it upon the entire country with a s**t-eating grin on his face. All they had to do was print the document and then scan it to a PDF file,release it to the media and this press conference goes away. No, instead these incompetent, traitorous jackasses release the source document and the experts have a field day with it.

This beggars the question, "If the President's Long Form Birth Certificate is fake, then where was he born?"

Sheriff Arpaio's task force attempted to find out. The problem is this, save for the forgery, every document surrounding Obama's birth (4 AUG 1961) is either sealed at Obama's request or does not exist. However, at 35:00 of the video, the task force details how they were able to obtain ten years worth of INS records from the National Archives containing information for every person entering the US from overseas - 685 rolls of microfilm. In examining those records it was found that starting on 1 AUG 1961 through 7 Aug 1961...

ALL INS RECORDS DISAPPEARED.

Shazaam! Gone! Was his mother on an airplane coming into Hawaii during these dates? We won't find out from the people whose responsiblilty is to keep track of this information.

Someone in the US Government does not want us to know and the National Archives has not provided an answer as to why those official records have been expunged.

HELLLLOOOOOO ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN! Anyone home?!?!?!

And one more thing, the Sheriff announced that they know where this file was stored twenty minutes before it was posted by the White House and they have perhaps identified the person who had it.

I'll again make the allegation that an incompetent, corrupt Administration has committed a crime and didn't know how to cover its tracks.

One word - Metadata.

These profoundly incompetent criminals didn't bother to check to  see if the metadata table was scrubbed.

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

sig94 said...

Anon - there's more than item that the NR has screwed up in their ridiculous editorial. These documents were never submitted to a vigorous forensic examination such as the one conducted by Maricopa County. And the judges have dismissed all the lawsuits based on everything BUT a vigorous forensic examination. The judges never let it get that far.

Nice try.

Anonymous said...

The "vigorous forensic examination" you refer to was an examination by unnamed "experts"--who neither proved their expertise nor their objectivity--of the software generated images of Obama's long form birth certificate.

Obama showed both a short form birth certificate and a long form birth certificate, and he showed both images of both of them and the ACTUAL PHYSICAL COPIES OF THEM, WITH THE SEAL ON THE BACK. The official physical copy of the long form was actually handed around in the White House press room, and everyone there got a chance to examine it and to feel the seal on the back. One reporter even photographed it.

Other research done on this issue:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/book-review-a-question-of-eligibility/#more-16786

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/obama-conspiracy-theories-blog-launches-investigation-into-sheriff-joes-cold-case-posse/

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-the-long-form-part-1/

http://www.thefogbow.com/arpaio-report/

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/03/on-the-release-of-report-from-sheriff-joe-arpaio-stating-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/

The DOH of Hawaii stated in a letter that she had seen the original birth certificate being copied onto security paper and that was the document that she gave to Obama’s lawyer.

The National Review is right:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

So is the Economist:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

sig94 said...

Anon - you still do not get it. A forensic examination is one that is governed by evidentiary rules of law, not some partisan hack - either Republican or Democrat - who purports to have conducted an examination.

Let this be settled in the public view subject to cross examination rather than in countless web sites which are not accountable under law for telling the truth. Let all these so-called experts from all sides be examined under penalty of perjury rather than by proclaimation on the web.

sig94 said...

Anon - and so they slap a seal or stamp something on a forged document? That's your proof?

The source document produced by the White House and posted on their web site bears very strong evidence that it was a manufactured document, not a copy of an orginal. And the Selective Service Card is even worse.

anon said...

from another blog:

"Imagine a Sheriff having a press conference to discuss an investigation into Bush’s involvement with 9/11, with Michael Moore and the “Loose Change” filmmaker at his side and writing/participating in the report as well."

I think you can understand why Americans outside the Birther club don't give this press conference any thought: people with an obvious axe to grind can't seriously be entrusted to perform an unbiased investigation. If you want an investigation that will be taken seriously then get a non-partisan group together who can agree to work together and present their findings together.

Anonymous said...

Re; 'A forensic examination is one that is governed by evidentiary rules of law, not some partisan hack - either Republican or Democrat - who purports to have conducted an examination."

Unfortunately Sheriff Joe IS a partisan hack. And he gave no details as to how he conducted that forensic examination. He certainly did not use any recognized document forensic specialists, such as those from the American Board of Forensic Document Examiners or the American Society of Questioned Document Experts or the Association of Forensic Document Examiners.

We know that Sheriff Joe did not even ASK to see the physical copy of the document, the one with the seal, and if you think that they "slapped a seal on it", that would be the way to find out. And they did not even ask the officials in Hawaii, who are by the way the real experts on whether a document is forged or not, whether it was forged, and whether they had sent a physical copy of the birth certificate to Obama (they had). They did not even check with the reporter who stated that she had seen the physical copy and felt the seal. IF she is lying, you do have to ask her about it. And, if the Sheriff thought that the reporter must have been lying, since he claims that the long form birth certificarte was not the copy sent by Hawaii but only a sofware version with the "seal slapped on it"--then why did he not question other reporters as to whether they had seen it and felt the seal?

Re: " Let this be settled in the public view subject to cross examination rather than in countless web sites.."

No problem. Let Sheriff Joe figure out how to get it to court. He is claiming a criminal act. Well, let him get a district attorney somewhere to bring charges. But Sheriff Joe did not say that he would do that. He is only making claims.

Re: " which are not accountable under law for telling the truth. Let all these so-called experts from all sides be examined under penalty of perjury rather than by proclaimation on the web."

Answer: No problem at all. IF Sheriff Joe can get a DA to bring charges, Obama will blow them away. But unless that happens, we simply have to decide whether Sheriff Joe can be believed more than THREE Republican officials in Hawaiii, and some Democrats, and the Hawaii birth certificate and the fact that Obama must have had a Hawaii birth certificate in 1961 because of the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers (which were only from the DOH in 1961; the newspapers only printed the DOH's birth announcments; they did not take birth notice ads or accept notices from relatives).

Re: "The source document produced by the White House and posted on their web site bears very strong evidence that it was a manufactured document,"

It is not a forgery or even illegal to enhance the visiblity of a document. There has been no proof that Obama had any fact on the document changed, and the officials in Hawaii have not said that any facts were changed.

Re: "the Selective Service Card is even worse."

Ah, but Sheriff Joe did not get the Selective Service card from Obama or from the Selective Service. He got it from a Web publication by a birther. Did the birther actually get the document from the Selective Service and NOT alter it? We cannot know unless and until the posse actually gets the document from the Selective Service itself, but it hasn't.

Gorges Smythe said...

A century ago, Obama would have been hung for treason in his first six months. (And maybe Bush along with him.) Unfortunately no one today seems to care.

They Say/We Say said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
sig94 said...

Anon - there is nothing unusual about keeping this information from the public at this stage of the investigation. It happens all the time and they will be called if this goes to a grand jury or trial. You have no idea what their professsional associations might be and to imply htat they do not belong to those organizations you cited is just plain idiotic.

With the Gov of Hawaii first claiming on a radio talk show that there was no BC and then recanting his words a few days later - I have no confidence in anything that comes out of that heavily Democratic state.

If you are truly concerned about political corruption - look no further than Obamaville, AKA the City of Chicago, AKA "The Most Corrupt City In America." Go ahead, google it. This is Obama's backyard and he runs DC the same way.

You haven't bothered to even listen to the video clip. There is no allegation of wrong doing, only that the BC is a fraud. No names have been given.

Trying to insinuate the the Hawaii was theonly agency to authorize a birth notice is ridiculous. The family can file with DOH and have the notice placed. The fact that such notice was placed is no indication that the birth actually occured in Hawaii and was never accepted as such. For you to use this is very misleading and only indicates that you are desperately seeking sticks to plug the dam like a hyperactive beaver.

Nice try. Just keep on hitting those Obama koolaid sites and cut and paste to your heart's content.

Anam Cara said...

Hanged. Hanged is the correct word when talking about a person's death.

They hung the curtains. They hanged the criminal.

WoFat said...

1984 is here, just a little late.

Tee said...

After watching some of this video (I skipped forward through parts of it), then reading the various rebuttals of it elsewhere, I stand by my assertion that a good portion of the GOP lives in a bubble of their own making. It seems to astound you guys that the entire country isn't up in arms over this press conference, but look at the finally released Breitbart video: conservatives get all angry and indignant, and everyone else just goes "meh. . . ." It's not that we are ignorant or uncaring, it's that we look at your evidence and say "interesting maybe, but not compelling"; it wouldn't stand up in court. This is really "moon-landing-hoax" territory, even Bigfoot stories are more compelling. The louder you guys beat this drum the more you alienate everyone else from your cause.

I had a neighbor that listened to AM talk radio all day long at work, Rush, Hannity, et al, and watched Fox News until he went to sleep at night. He was always on edge, saying "it's coming, it's coming, we're all going to be in camps" and making predictions that never came true ("you watch, Obama will suspend the election so he keeps his majority in congress!") That's no way to live your life. He got kicked out of the building and blamed the Ethiopians (Muslims!") and Puerto Ricans ("illegals!") there, when the eviction notice clearly said "no pets" and he had a German Shepherd that barked all the time.

Look: in your minds you guys have so successfully discredited any media source outside Fox News, Rush, and conservative blogs that your "trusted" news sources can lie to you and you wouldn't even know it. You're stuck like a fish on a hook.

sig94 said...

Tee - it's reall funny bit I am neither a Fox nor Rush nor ever been a Hannity (too strident)listener - haven't been for years and years. I do have training and experience in computer forensics(my first computer forensics case was a double homicide) and I find the video evidence compelling because of that. I can understand if you are less than impressed simply because 1) extreme partisanship, or 2) lack of knowledge. Because if the WH file is a copy of the actual electronic file for Obama's BC that was released by the Hawaii DOH, then there is serious fraud afoot - there is no other forensic evidence supporting a true unmanufactured document that answers all the issues dsicovered by the Maricopa Posse. You just don't seem to catch the significance of this.

sig94 said...

Anam - if they rammed a curtain rod you know where, could they then have him hung?

sig94 said...

WoFat - 1984 is a state of mind as well as a state of being. We are already in the former and almost through the door of the latter.

Kid said...

Well, this is actually a good thing. I believe the voting system in the USA to be so rigged as to make Valdimir putey Pute Blush.

My point being that if the eligibility of this muslim bastard can be debunked, then he can be removed from the ballot for 2012 by some number of states that still have an American conscience. The dems have no one else to run.

sig94 said...

Kd - we'll just have to see where Arizona goes with this. I imagine there are other states that are considering the same thing while PootyPoot is having a good laugh over America's distress.

But on the other hand regarding Putin, wasn't it Bush 43 that said that "I looked the man in the eye. I was able to get a sense of his soul. I knew that President Putin was a man with whom I could work.”

Putin must have dropped his pants and Bush was peering into his brown eye.

Tee said...

I'm just telling you how things look from over here. Whether the evidence is compelling or not is moot for the rest of the country; once Obama released the long form birth certificate everyone except you guys moved on. Even other conservatives have moved on: there's no mention of Sheriff Joe's press conference on Newsmax, Rush hasn't spent any time on it as far as I can tell, and Fox News seems to have mentioned it once but isn't dwelling on it.

You can complain about how most of the country is ignorant and stupid and nothing but sheep, but the reality of the situation is that using this evidence to remove Obama from power is a Herculean task, and the odds are stacked against you.

sig94 said...

Tee - oh I agree! Herculean may be too soft an adjective on this issue. The ground was well prepared in advance and resists any growth for these seeds.

Look how long and vigorously the weeds grew around a forged TANG document that cost Gunga Dan his job. This forgery goes no where fast.

Anonymous said...

Re: "With the Gov of Hawaii first claiming on a radio talk show that there was no BC and then recanting his words a few days later - I have no confidence in anything that comes out of that heavily Democratic state."

The Democrat governor of Hawaii never said that there was no birth certificate. A birther site said that he said it, but he didn't say it.

He said, along with the former Republican governor and two Republican officials and the current DOH of Hawaii that there is an original birth certificate. This is further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961. The birth notices were ONLY sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in those days. The papers did not take notices from relatives, only from the government. And the DOH did not send out notices for children born outside of Hawaii.

Anonymous said...

Other research done on this issue:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/book-review-a-question-of-eligibility/#more-16786

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/obama-conspiracy-theories-blog-launches-investigation-into-sheriff-joes-cold-case-posse/

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-the-long-form-part-1/

http://www.thefogbow.com/arpaio-report/

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/03/on-the-release-of-report-from-sheriff-joe-arpaio-stating-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/

The DOH of Hawaii stated in a letter that she had seen the original birth certificate being copied onto security paper and that was the document that she gave to Obama’s lawyer.

The National Review:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

The Economist:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

sig94 said...

Anonymous - *yawn* again, nice try. They couldn't find Obama's long form BC and the Gov. was getting worried about it. Aren't you a little sick and tired of being wrong or does drinking all that koolaid keep you strong??

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html

Pressure was mounting on Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie today amid increasing confusion over whether President Obama was born there.
Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.
He told Honolulu's Star-Advertiser: 'It actually exists in the archives, written down,' he said.
But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama's birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.
And in the same interview Abercrombie suggested that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.
He said efforts were still being made to track down definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii.
Abercrombie was asked: 'You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama's birth certificate. How is that coming?'
He acknowledged the birth certificate issue would have 'political implications' for the next presidential election 'that we simply cannot have'.

And, Miracle Of Miracles, that's when this phony document showed up on the White House porch.

Ask me for my birth certificate Anonymous, I can locate it in a heartbeat. I don't need to go bouncing around the NY State archives for weeks and months trying to get a copy. I have the stamped, wrinkled, spindled and folded all to hell certified copy that my Mom gave me when I turned 18.

Anonymous said...

Re: "They couldn't find Obama's long form BC and the Gov. was getting worried about it. Aren't you a little sick and tired of being wrong or does drinking all that koolaid keep you strong??"

Aren't you tired of being played for a fool by birther sites?

Show an article other than from a birther site that says that Abercrombie said that he could not find the birth certificate.

You can't because HE NEVER SAID IT. It is now a birther myth based on a birther article which in turn was speculation and not facts.

The fact is that Abercrombie never said that he could not find the birth certificate. HOWEVER, three Republican officials and several Democrats stated in writing that in fact they had seen the birth certificate, in the file where it is supposed to be. And there is a fourth who saw it, the clerk who filled in the form that generated the short-form birth certificate got the information for that FROM THE DOCUMENT IN THE FILES.

IN addition there is the confirmation of the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers, which at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii (the papers did not take their birth notices from relatives at the time; they only took the official notices of the DOH of Hawaii). And the DOH of Hawaii did not send out birth notices for people who were not born in Hawaii.

Anonymous said...

Other research done on this issue:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/book-review-a-question-of-eligibility/#more-16786

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/obama-conspiracy-theories-blog-launches-investigation-into-sheriff-joes-cold-case-posse/

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-the-long-form-part-1/

http://www.thefogbow.com/arpaio-report/

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/03/on-the-release-of-report-from-sheriff-joe-arpaio-stating-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/

The DOH of Hawaii stated in a letter that she had seen the original birth certificate being copied onto security paper and that was the document that she gave to Obama’s lawyer. And that birth certificate was passed around in the White House press room and everyone there got a chance to hold it, and feel the seal. One reporter even photographed it.

The National Review said:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

The Economist said:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

Bob Kimble said...

"
And, Miracle Of Miracles, that's when this phony document showed up on the White House porch. "

When you believe a conspiracy as grand as this one, everything that happens can be interpreted as evidence to that effect. In this case the document shows up *at just the right time*, but of course *when* is the "right time"? A few weeks later, a few weeks earlier, right before the election, right before the mid-term election, all could be called "the perfect time" IF you think the document is phony and is being produced for some political effect.

"Ask me for my birth certificate Anonymous, I can locate it in a heartbeat. I don't need to go bouncing around the NY State archives for weeks and months trying to get a copy. I have the stamped, wrinkled, spindled and folded all to hell certified copy that my Mom gave me when I turned 18."

Ahhh, but many people don't. In fact when I went to get a passport I had to pay my home state, which is not where I currently live, $30 (payable by postal money order only) and wait 3 months for an official photocopy. The fact that you have one is not any kind of proof regarding Obama or anyone else. In his case he already KNOWS he was born in the US, it was never debated before, so what's the big deal. You will likely never believe he was born in the USA, no matter what evidence comes to light, so why even try to placate you?

The thing about these kinds of grand conspiracy theories is that even evidence that disproves your theory is considered PROOF of your theory, a la "oh, how perfect, a red herring to throw us off, it must be part of the conspiracy!"

standford said...

Valentine’s Day was such a lucky day for us as a result of we tend to got the gift of getting Haba Salama take photos of those superb kids and families.
secret intelligence service