I assume the Brits, like everyone else, thought Hillary Clinton was a shoo in so they went along with a request from US intelligence sources. Their mission, should they accept it, is to lift the skirts of Trump's electronic communications and have a looksee at The Donald's goodies.
"This'll put us in good with the Yanks", says they, "and after the election Winnie's bust will soon be back where it belongs, in the White House, glaring at that dreadful, horse-faced lesbian. Cheerio!"
Story here.
"This'll put us in good with the Yanks", says they, "and after the election Winnie's bust will soon be back where it belongs, in the White House, glaring at that dreadful, horse-faced lesbian. Cheerio!"
Fox News Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano claimed “three intelligence sources” say President Obama looked to British spy agency GCHQ to obtain transcripts of conversations involving President Donald Trump on “Fox & Friends” on Tuesday.No one is sure what Trump will do in the best of circumstances. Lord only knows how he will take the Brits to task for this.
[..]He used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database. So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”
Story here.
And of course the Brits enter the frey, they say, "Nay, no way Jose":
A spokesperson for the British government is speaking out several hours after Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano claimed that “three intelligence sources” informed him that former President Barack Obama employed the British intel service to spy on then-candidate Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election.Their response here.
“No part of this story is true,” the spokesperson told The Blaze Tuesday afternoon.
3 comments:
Trump had the proof when he tweeted.
Now the Congress and the Senate has a problem.
Shove it under the rug? (when could politicians keep a secret) Or put it out there? I'm guessing that the British PM gave it to Trump.
A hammer with nine moving parts...
This story of Donald Trump being wiretap could sum up a lot of the stuff we have been blogging since the Edward Snowden days
Trump’s Allegations of Wiretapping - tracking
http://goodstuffsworld.blogspot.com/2017/03/trumps-allegations-of-wiretapping.html
LL - this is gonna be gud.
Post a Comment