Pages

October 16, 2009

Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord

Cbullitt at Soylent Green has been acting as Paul Revere and notifying the Internet about this sobering story. Opus #6 has reposted it and I'm doing the same.

The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.

A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.

Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.


I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.

[laughter]

And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.

But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.

So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:

Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!
Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:
Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.

I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.

Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I -

I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.

I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?

I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.
Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.

Edited to add @ 8:31 am:

Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:

World Government (heading added)
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)
b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.

With Enforcement Authority (heading added)
© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].

18 comments:

Cbullitt said...

Two if by sea, Nickie. Nice job.

WomanHonorThyself said...

did u hear his narcissism in New Orleans..gah!..Have a super weekend my friend!!:)

Greg said...

So all the conspiracy theory nuts that have been sounding the horn about this for years are right!

Teresa said...

This treaty must be stopped!! We must email all of our Congressman of this horror. This is all a part of the New World Order that these socialist progressives want. Yes, the poorer countries do need help, but not at the expense of our freedom and liberty.

Amy Tate said...

Very interesting and very well written. We are living in monumental times, aren't we?

Opus #6 said...

I can't wait for the day that does NOT bring another 4 alarm fire. Maybe that will come in late 2010 or early 2011? I pray.

The Conservative Lady said...

Nickie:
Thanks for posting this. I did a story about it on Earth Day and will re-post this article as a follow up.
This is absolutely terrible, and we never hear a darn thing about it in the MSM and what the real implications of it are to America.

Chris W said...

Holy crap.

We just can't stand by quietly and let the POTUS (Progressive of the United States) get away with shredding the Constitution.

We all need to write our elected officials to let them know that We the People do not support this and will fight to retain our sovereignty.

This also needs to go up on as may blogs as possible to spread the word. I know I will.

Opus #6 said...

Chris W, you made a nice post out of it, I like that you added the actual video of Lord Monckton at the end. Cool!

Chris W said...

Opus #6

Thanks for the kudos. I give all the credit to Al Gore for inventing the interweb.

T. F. Stern said...

This treaty has the "blessing" of both R's and D's who are in office and yes, Greg has it right, "So all the conspiracy theory nuts that have been sounding the horn about this for years are right!"

Doom said...

I realized long ago this was the gig. The science has always been bunk, it was always about power. Everything related to green, world wide equalizing, unilateralism, resource sharing, open boarders, and a host of other bunk has all been leading to one conclusion. It has been on the agenda, to an extent in both parties, for a long time. Actively, for at least a decade, probably two decades. Though I think it has been on one or the other party's agendas for well over a hundred years (remember, Republicans used to be THE progressive party).

Republicans are less enamored, as a whole and these days, but I have seen it in the party and not weakly. This cannot go well if left to it's own devices. There are so many heads to this Hydra that it will take Michael to step in. Or, at least, be with us as we do.

The Conservative Lady said...

Nickie:
Glenn Beck tweeted that he will contact Lord Monckton regarding his comments on the Treaty of Copenhagen.
I posted tweet and a video of Monckton on my blog.

RG said...

"Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass... Exodus 20:17 KJV

YYYYEEEEEEEEHHHHHAAAAWWWW!!!! A SIX GUN NEO-CON riding into the GOOMBA NETWORK OK Corral, guns-a-blazin!

First of all let me define Obama's plan for CHANGE.

Socialism
Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.

Communism
A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.

Proletariat
In Marxism, the industrial working class, people without property.

Forget the pitchforks. Colts and Winchester Varmint Guns will protect the ranch, inlaws and livestock from poachers. I do have to take off my Serratelli to the ONLY good thing the communist Chinese ever gave the world (re: the AR-15 and a couple of 30 round banana clips).

Adios. But just remember. Praising the Lord and passing the ammunition! is the ONLY thing to do.

Sempre Forte! (Stay Strong)

banned said...

Thank you Nickie, most enlightening.

It still puzzels me why, here in UK, politicians of all sides have willingly ceded power to the European Union even though they themselves lose power as a result; looks like you in the USA may be pondering a similar question.

Lawyers have a Latin phrase for the question that translates " who benefits ?" Who indeed.

Amusing Bunni said...

Great post Nickie, I'm glad it's making the rounds. Let's hope Glenn takes this on....I have a feeling he will, because it's such an outrageous story.

Starsplash said...

Better get the sons of the rebublic ready. George Washingtons Prophecy cause I think this one could do it.

Quite Rightly said...

Thanks for the heads up!

I reposted this at http://quite-rightly.blogspot.com/2009/10/usa-beacon-of-freedom-not-world-lackey.html