Pages

October 17, 2009

General-Motors.Gov

From the Introduction to Men, Money and Motors - The Drama of the Automobile, (1929) by Theodore MacManus and Norman Beasley

There was a huge picturesqueness to those pursuers of fortune. They had about them something of the tang and flavor of piracy. The stuff from which men are made heroic was not altogether lacking in them. Big things were done and the doers became big in the doing. When we measuree the paths through which we have come this was as it should have been.

Heraldry is gone. The s
turdy trek behind the covered wagon is no more. Business has become the last great heroism. In its beginnings the automobile business was as were - and will be - the beginnings of all business…a conflict of the hard-muscled and strong-willed, for only they survive….Business is business, and not the saving of the soul nor the redemption of the body politic.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

General Motors was orginally called International Motors. It was formed in 1908 by the genius huckster capitalist, William Durant. It almost included Ford Motor Company, but for a disagreement over cash transfers, so it began life as a merger of Cadillac, Oakland, Oldsmobile and Buick.

By 1917, GM had 20 more automobile companies, along with electrical producers, lamp companies, rim and wheel companies and other subsidiaries and a credit arm, GMAC, which was added in 1917. Durant lost control of GM in 1911, but won it back in 1916 in what amounted to a hostile takeover with Chevrolet Motor Cars as the truncheon, which almost ended up as the parent of GM. The authors of Men, Money and Motors lamented, in 1929, that there were fewer than fifty auto manufacturers in the US.

GM's tumble from 1929 to today's market irrelevance and government parasitism didn't follow a straight line, but its angle downward became acute in the 1970's, when (it's said) the company was taken over by money men. It was, after all, Roger Smith who provided the opportunity for Michael Moore to make his place in documentary history. Roger Smith was an idiot, but that's not important now.

There was, in my view, a change in the idea of competition itself. The money men at GM seemed to believe that perception of value, rather than genuine product superiority, could be achieved by trickery and packaging rather than through the objective realities of superior engineering. For years they produced junk that was dressed up to look like their fierce competitors, the Euro and Japanese models, and gave them ridiculous names that sounded like adjectives, or names like Euro Sport, which with its quality, begged to be forever known as the Chevrolet Urine Spot. Today? Well, you know what's going on today.

The horrifying lesson for conservatives is that Big Business has the same dessicating effect as Big Government. It turns everything to dust. It spurns roughneck talent and squelches disorganized energy for the squirming discomfort they inflict on the suits at Mahogany Row. Every capitalist bureaucrat is essentially a statist. This is why it was so easy for the auto clods and the bankers to merge their interests with the Obama Administration. Or why Cap/Trade and ObamaCare is so popular with GE and others. Corporatism is where the money is, this time around.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

If I'm ever tempted to purchase a GM product, I ask someone to whisper the words "Chevy Vega" in my ear. I'm cured.

That car summed up GM to me... No style over substance.

Rhod said...

I persuaded a former girl friend to buy one of the first Vegas. I like to remember her that way.

Chris W said...

Hey, my first car was a canary yellow 74 Vega wagon that my mom gave me. I got made out pretty good with it too, drove it for a year and the aluminum block cracked 2 weeks after I sold it for $100. Good times.

I recently had to purchase a Chevy truck for the company I work for. Imagine how dirty I felt having to support Government Motors AND the C4C program.

Rhod said...

Chris, you didn't tell us if the Vega was one year plus two weeks old before the heads and block went, but that's probably about right.

Also, if you remember, you needed the right forearm of Popeye to raise the shifter detent with index and middle finger to shift into reverse. With a Vega you always had to make sure you could drive straight away.

McGonagall said...

Had a Chevy Caprice once - good car.

Rhod said...

Caprice. How bourgeois.

Chris W said...

Rhod,

Actually the thing was 10 years old when it met it's demise. My mom got it used with 20K on it and maybe put 5 miles a day on it. By the time I got it in 83 it only had about 40K on it.

Also it was an automatic so I didn't have the shifting issue.

Funny thing was my friend that bought it shoehorned in a 350 after the 4 died. We had to beat the firewall back with sledgehammers to squeeze it in.

Oh the memories.

Opus #6 said...

I like the car cartoon. I really don't want a GM car. I typed BM just now. Freudian slip?

LL said...

I call GM vehicles manufactured under the US Government label as "Obamas" There is the Obama Malibu and the Obama Corvette, for example. And I ask people at the gas station if they like their Obama.

They are Edzels of the modern era.

The Rattler - III said...

I had always hoped to buy a brand new corvette just because. Always loved the 68 Camero for a classic car to go cruisin. Now all my car dreams are screwed. This has been a very bad year for my dreams.

Anonymous said...

There's something comforting in knowing that Obama has even a small part of his legacy associated with Chevrolets. Now if he'd only nationalize Denny's.

Rhod said...

TK, the sledgehammer method was taught at GM. Slap an Olds 200 tranny on that 350 and you'd have a Cimmaron. Quality!

Speaking of the Cimmaron, the Caddy version of the Chevy Cavalier, in the 1980's one of GM's VP's was asked what the difference was between the Cavalier and the Cimmaron, and he said "about five thousand dollars".

The Obamobiles will revive the bleeding edge technology of the '68Camaro, the showroom appeal of the Edsel, and the panache and styling of the Trabant.

Where's the wall of separation between business and the state?

McGonagall said...

Rhod said...
"Caprice. How bourgeois."

Aw c'mon - it was six years old but in mint condition and only cost me a thousand bucks.

Rhod said...

You sound like a capitalist, scunnert, not an anarcho- socialist.

Envisioning you in a lead sled Caprice in your Mao cap, listening to an eight-track of the "Internationale" on the tape player, is...strange.

It was probably red.

McGonagall said...

Rhod said...
"You sound like a capitalist, scunnert, not an anarcho- socialist.

Envisioning you in a lead sled Caprice in your Mao cap, listening to an eight-track of the "Internationale" on the tape player, is...strange.

It was probably red."

Jimmy Reid once said he was not interested in bringing everyone to the lowest common denominator, but looked forward to the day when every working man could don a tuxedo and drive off in a Rolls Royce.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Reid

Rhod said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
cbullitt said...

"It spurns roughneck talent and squelches disorganized energy for the squirming discomfort they inflict on the suits at Mahogany Row."

Nicely phrased.

Rhod said...

Scunner, after reading your comment at the other post, I decided to delete my comment here.