Excuse me for asking:
Now that it's been revealed that no DNA test had been done before President Obama declared the death of Osama bin Laden, was the identity only verified by mobile facial recognition (supposed 99.9% accuracy)? We are now told the identification was made on facial recognition technology, using a photograph "wired back" to Washington from Abbottabad. Was that before or after his face was blown away with two head shots? Wikipedia says:
"Other conditions where face recognition does not work well include poor lighting, sunglasses, long hair, or other objects partially covering the subject's face, and low resolution images. Another serious disadvantage is that many systems are less effective if facial expressions vary. Even a big smile can render the system less effective."I'm just asking.
The DNA test was done using a control sample from Bin Laden's sister. Would that be, as the Obama administration has claimed, 99.9% accurate? ? I'm just asking.
Well, at least if there are any doubts, the authorities still have custody of the body, so they can repeat the tests. Oh, crap! The Obama administration used the Chicago-style "cement shoes" technique of quickly getting rid of any evidence. Why? I'm just asking.
I want to celebrate the death of that tyrant as much as any other American citizen wants to do, but two plus years of this administration has taught me this:
DO NOT TRUST THE GOVERNMENT.
NEVER BELIEVE THESE LYING BASTARDS.Remember this one? Obama's father was 10 years old when World War II ended.