Pages

January 10, 2010

There'll Always Be an England...


Health and safety experts warn: don't clear icy pavements, you could get sued

Pavements are being left covered in ice because of “ludicrous” laws that put home owners and businesses at risk of being sued if they try to clear them.

The Telegraph

Heavy snow, low temperatures and a lack of gritting mean pavements throughout the country are too slippery to walk on safely. Hospitals have been struggling to cope with rising numbers of patients who have broken bones after falling on icy paths.
Yet the professional body that represents health and safety experts has issued a warning to businesses not to grit public paths – despite the fact that Britain is in the grip of its coldest winter for nearly half a century.

Under current legislation, householders and companies open themselves up to legal action if they try to clear a public pavement outside their property. If they leave the path in a treacherous condition, they cannot be sued.

Councils, who have a responsibility for public highways, say they have no legal obligation to clear pavements.

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents expressed its disappointment that public safety was being neglected because of fears of possible litigation. A spokesman said: “This is not showing a particularly good attitude. It would be much safer for the public to clear paths, even if it’s not on their property.”

But the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health, the professional body representing 36,000 health and safety experts, gave warning that this could lead to legal action.

(More...)

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."

Wetzy said...

The second thing is to check to see if they are all dead. One could survive and sue you.

Anonymous said...

Here's the bad news. They might well sue you from beyond the grave.

Two words: wooden stake

Steven Givler said...

Ah, the mistake is that the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents didn't make having the wrong attitude illegal. That would have solved everything!

Anonymous said...

Steven, you are correct.

Starsplash said...

Holy OMG!

Woodsterman (Odie) said...

Ah, I know ice ... This year it's heavy.

Rhod said...

Cool Brittania, indeed.

The Royal Society for the Promotion of Stupidity, working closely with New Labor, is behind this one.

Anonymous said...

Ahhhh! Makes you want to rush right out and hug the first lawyer you see, doesn't it?

NOT!

Anonymous said...

We've inherited the litigious society :o(

We always used to salt our paths and shovel the snow next to our homes. Things started to change in the late 80s. I remember an investigative TV programme pointing out how a householder had been sued for tens of thousands when someone had slipped on the cleared path by their home. Word spreads and people stop clearing the snow :S

On this issue I understand that things are a lot more sensible in continental Europe. People are still allowed to be sensible and community spirited there.

sig94 said...

From a nation of shopkeepers to a nation of risk avoiders. There's nothing as slow and painful as being nibbled to death by bureaucrats. The same fate awaits America if we don't wake up.

Bloviating Zeppelin said...

I think that's fabulous. To hell with others. Just be careful when you extricate yourSELF from your house.

Sig94: the same fate is already IN America. That's why, off-duty, my blinders are ON. I LIKE my house and my cars -- though Mr Obama is doing his level best to TAKE those from me and produce me a pauper.

BZ

IOSH media office said...

The Sunday Telegraph Report about businesses gritting public spaces was inaccurate – there is no IOSH guidance telling businesses not to grit. We were contacted by the Telegraph for a comment last week and supplied one saying that we encourage businesses to be a good employer and neighbour by gritting beyond property boundaries to prevent accidents and to make sure that the task is carried out thoroughly.

This comment was ignored, and instead they took words from the “Just Ask” column of SHP magazine in February last year, contributed by legal consultancy Croner, and attributed them to IOSH, passing this off as guidance issued by IOSH to its members.

IOSH has been completely misrepresented. Full details of the story and inaccuracies of the Telegraph report are on our website http://bit.ly/7LxGMR.