Pages

June 29, 2009

Britain's major political parties continue to ignore the elephant in the room. So, guess what's happening now!!


Richard at EU Referendum accurately addresses a political time bomb ticking in the UK
"...while Thatcher killed off the National Front in the late 70s by taking the issue immigration head-on, Cameron is silent. The subject scares away voters in the marginal seats he needs to take power. Westminster only cares about swing voters in swing seats - so millions are forgotten. Thus writes Nelson, the silence from Westminster suggests that the BNP's "shocking success story" is far from over."
In the News of the World yesterday, Fraser Nelson writes a piece under the heading "Condemned by silence".

He notes that, three weeks since the BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY's election triumph, no party has started to discuss immigration. Westminster parties have kept their baffled silence and are giving the BNP a monopoly over the most explosive issue in politics.

You'd think, writes Nelson. Gordon Brown and David Cameron would have been shocked into action after seeing Griffin win a seat in Brussels, his party taking almost a million votes.

Immigration was always a "big subject" and it is bigger now because layoffs in the recessions are hitting British-born people hardest. Directly from the Office for National Statistics – but not openly published – Nelson has found that there are fewer UK-born workers in the private sector than 12 years ago.

In the last year there are 119,000 more migrant workers in UK jobs, but 615,000 fewer UK-born workers. In recent months, both are falling. But UK-born workers are being laid off at five times the rate. Workers, he says, can see it with their own eyes, and ask: why? And because no mainstream party has an answer, the BNP prospers. (More...)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I've been following Britain's decline/disappearance since the 1970's. It's a land of declining expectations.

I've spent a lot of time there (no more), and to understand them, Orwell's essays from the '40's are a good place to start. (Also, Muggeridge's book "The Thirties", describes the social and political pathologies that led to today's situation both in England and the US).

Brits are amazingly passive, as are most Europeans, when they aren't slaughtering everyone in sight. Things always seem to reach critical mass before they react. With the EU's neo-feudalism
on the way, expect the worst.

Rhod

Anonymous said...

The rise of the BNP and Geert Wilder (not to mention the recent gain of LePen's bunch) display again that every political action has an opposite, if somewhat unequal, reaction.

You wanna talk about an inconvenient truth? Rhod, I wonder where critical mass will be reached this time around.